arXiv daily Agent Benchmarks
Agent News ↗ GitHub

Daily Agent Benchmarks

A once-a-day reading list of new agent benchmarks on arXiv — LLM agents, web and GUI agents, coding agents, tool use, computer use, multi-agent, embodied and safety evaluations.

1671papers
298days
2026-11-09latest drop

Latest agent benchmarks

On November 9, 2026, arXiv listed 6 new agent benchmarks. Work clustered around Tool use (3), Multi-agent (2), Planning / reasoning (2), and Science lab (2). Browse the full archive.

WorkflowArena: Benchmarking Executable Workflow Orchestration in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

2026-11-09 · 2611.12856 · Zheng Jiang, Fang Niu, Bo Peng et al. · Work / office

Large language model agents are increasingly deployed as multi-agent systems rather than as a standalone model operating within a single context. Recent agent harnesses allow the model to instantiate worker agents and to author the executable workflow that coordinates them, shifting the design of system structure…

0citations

Joi-Bench-Task: Benchmarking Task Coordination in Full-duplex Voice Agents through Interactive Simulation

2026-11-09 · 2611.12118 · Xiangheng He, Mingjun Zhao, Zhehao Fan et al. · Tool use

Full-duplex voice agents enable natural, hands-free interaction, allowing users to refine requests, redirect ongoing work, and seek clarification while the agent is speaking. However, existing voice-agent benchmarks insufficiently isolate coordination between task execution and conversation. We introduce a benchmark…

0citations

Benchmarking language models and agents for scientific reasoning in evolving materials laboratories

2026-11-09 · 2611.12014 · Xuyu Dong, Yixuan Li, Jianguo Huang et al. · Science & research

Large language models and the multi-agent systems built around them could accelerate materials discovery by connecting scientific knowledge with experimental decisions. Existing benchmarks establish capabilities in domain knowledge, multimodal interpretation and scientific tool use. As language models increasingly…

0citations

Infrathon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Real-World, Long-Horizon AI Infra Optimization

2026-11-09 · 2611.11995 · Zhengyu Hu, Zheyuan Xiao, Yike Wang et al. · General

In this work, we study whether frontier agent can continually improve real-world AI infrastructure over long horizons. We introduce Infrathon, a benchmark of diverse, long-horizon AI infrastructure optimization tasks across different levels. We evaluate six models across 150 runs with 24-hour budgets, totaling over…

0citations

LEGION: Benchmarking Language Agents on Sparse-Signal Investigation Under Adversarial Noise

2026-11-09 · 2611.11896 · Samuel Joseph Amouyal, Ofek Glick, Yaniv Menasherov et al. · Tool use

Autonomous language-model agents are increasingly deployed on discovery-driven tasks where signal is sparse and most retrieved information is irrelevant. Current benchmarks fail to evaluate this regime due to dense signals, cooperative environments, and ground truth typically being only a few tool calls away. We…

0citations

Publications as benchmarks: auditing AI agents on spatial transcriptomics alignment

2026-11-09 · 2611.11796 · Yiqun T. Chen, Jan Matthias, Jianing Yao et al. · Safety

AI agents are increasingly automating data analysis, but responsible adoption requires reliable performance evaluation, which is costly in specialized scientific domains. We introduce a framework that translates scientific publications into auditable benchmarks for AI agents and demonstrate its use on spatial…

0citations

A Physical Testbed for Self-Driving Laboratories: Comparing Bayesian and Agentic Optimization in a Minimal Closed-Loop Color Formulation Task

2026-11-08 · 2611.11690 · Tony Qin, Ziheng Wu, Maximilian Schommer et al. · General

Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) integrate laboratory robotics and automation with AI-driven decision-making to close the design-build-test-learn (DBTL) cycle. However, physical testbeds that combine off-the-shelf hardware and AI into a functioning closed-loop workflow remain in early stages of development, and their…

0citations

How to "train" a surgeon? Benchmarking generalist agents in surgical scene understanding

2026-11-08 · 2611.11437 · Gengyuan Zhang, Xiao Han, Shijie Zhou et al. · GUI / computer use

Evaluating general-purpose multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for surgical scene understanding remains limited due to scarce surgical data and fragmented evaluation protocols. We address these challenges through a two-stage evaluation framework for surgical scene understanding. In Stage I, we introduce…

0citations

ScrapeBench: Evaluating Legal Compliance of AI Agents in Website Scraping

2026-11-08 · 2611.11306 · Joseph Marvin Imperial, Daniel Slate, Noam Kolt · General

AI agents deployed on the open web are becoming more capable of performing actions that may breach contractual provisions and violate computer security laws. In this paper, we introduce ScrapeBench, the first agentic benchmark for empirically evaluating the legal compliance of AI agents with website scraping…

0citations

ErosionBench: Probing Alignment Decay in Enterprise Multi-Agent Systems

2026-11-08 · 2611.11266 · Riya Bharathwaj, Akshara Prabhakar, Roshan Ram et al. · Multi-agent

As enterprises delegate consequential work to multi-agent LLM systems, benign-looking requests can escalate into unsafe actions as they propagate across sessions through poisoned shared state, long-context documents, and trusted peer messages: no single message is malicious, yet the assembled tool action is. Prior…

0citations

CyberBinGym: Can AI Agents Turn Binary Patches into Real Exploits?

2026-11-07 · 2611.10723 · Lambang Akbar Wijayadi, Zhaoqi Xiao, Zhun Wang et al. · General

Security fixes usually reach users as compiled updates, but deployment delays leave unpatched systems exposed. During this window, comparing patched and unpatched binaries can reveal how to exploit a vulnerability, turning a defensive update into actionable information for attackers. Existing benchmarks do not…

0citations

DFT-Agent Bench: Scaffold Effects and Execution Provenance in Autonomous DFT

2026-11-07 · 2611.10629 · Shijie Liu, Jin Yang, Weilin Wan et al. · General

Large language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents for first-principles materials simulation. We report empirical findings from DFT-Agent Bench, a benchmark of 200+ Quantum ESPRESSO tasks spanning relaxation, electronic structure, equation-of-state, and elastic-tensor pipelines over multiple…

0citations

Agentic discrete-event simulation for manufacturing system design: an open 3D simulator, a benchmark and an industrial case

2026-11-07 · 2611.10602 · Javier Pernas-Álvarez, Diego Crespo-Pereira · Tool use

The design of manufacturing systems relies on discrete-event simulation (DES) models that experts still build in tool-specific interfaces. AI agents can now write simulation code, but every model they write from scratch is new, unverified software. We present SimuLean, an open-source 3D DES simulator on the Unity…

0citations

InfoOrgBench: Can Agents Turn Scattered Information into Coherent Hierarchies?

2026-11-07 · 2611.10600 · Justice Ou, Lanming Ma, Zijian Zhang et al. · General

When agents organize records into folders, they may correctly group the excerpts of a design proposal yet place the proposal under the wrong owning group. Existing agent benchmarks do not directly measure such higher-level errors. We introduce InfoOrgBench, a benchmark of 150 tasks in which agents organize scattered…

0citations

TurnFlow: Benchmarking User-State Reasoning in Multi-Turn LLM Agents via Scene-Guided User Simulation

2026-11-07 · 2611.10412 · Zhixun Chen, Ming Li, Anjie Liu et al. · General

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed through conversational interfaces, yet strong single-turn performance does not imply reliability in multi-turn settings. Multi-turn assistance requires a model to maintain an evolving representation of user requirements and to reason over it before complying with…

0citations

Done Is Not Correct: Measuring Silent Failures and Self-Verification Calibration When LLM Agents Take CAD Actions

2026-11-06 · 2611.10063 · Carson Rodrigues, Clive Rodrigues, Aravind Reddy G · Tool use

When a large language model (LLM) agent writes parametric CAD code from a natural-language specification, syntactic success decouples from semantic correctness. We release a benchmark and harness that measure this gap directly: 13 specification tasks whose every requirement maps to machine-checkable properties of the…

0citations

MemoryDojo: Benchmarking Poisoning Through LLM Agent Memory

2026-11-06 · 2611.09721 · David H. Yang, Blake Bullwinkel, Amanda Minnich et al. · General

LLM agents benefit from using memory systems to improve performance on long-horizon, multi-session tasks. However, memory introduces a critical attack surface. Malicious instructions encountered in one session may be stored and propagated through memory before being retrieved and acted upon in later sessions. Because…

0citations

Frontier3DBench: Benchmarking Coding Agents for 3D Creation across Objects, Scenes, and Interactive Open Worlds

2026-11-06 · 2611.09017 · Xinjie Lin, Qingle Liu, Wenyi Li et al. · Coding / SWE

Coding agents combine visual understanding with program execution, offering a new route to automated 3D creation. By translating images and instructions into editable programs, they bring reconstruction, generation, and editing into a shared workflow. Yet existing benchmarks fragment evaluation across task scopes and…

0citations

Phantom Consensus: Measuring Social Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLM Decision-Making

2026-11-06 · 2611.08971 · Disha Sheshanarayana, Rajat Subhra Pal, Manjira Sinha et al. · Multi-agent

Multi-agent LLM systems increasingly aggregate judgments across model instances, but reasoning about other agents can itself introduce failure. We study a setting in which LLMs shift their public decisions after observing ambiguous social signals while reporting inaccurate estimates of what other agents privately…

0citations

Flex-RSI: Benchmarking Recursive Self-Improvement of Frontier Agents

2026-11-06 · 2611.08946 · Jingdong Zhang, Jionghao Wang, Zhengming Yu et al. · RSI / AI4AI

Frontier language models are increasingly deployed as agents, and how well an agent performs depends not only on its model but also on its harness: the prompts, tools, memory, and control loop through which the model acts. When an agent is applied to a new problem, a natural question is whether it can use the…

0citations

DRAFT-Bench: Evaluating Frontier Agents Across the Professional Design Lifecycle

2026-11-06 · 2611.08933 · Rong Pan, Jianqiang Wang · Tool use

Can frontier general-purpose agents understand client intent, explore creative directions, execute revisions, and prepare production deliverables? We introduce DRAFT-Bench (Design Reliability Across Feedback and Tasks), a lifecycle-oriented evaluation of requirement elicitation, creative exploration, constrained…

0citations

Benchmarks as Software: Terminal-Bench and the Case for Continuous Benchmarks

2026-11-05 · 2611.08417 · E. Kelly Buchanan, Crystal Zhou, Scott W. Linderman et al. · Coding / SWE

Coding agents are among the most economically consequential deployments of LLMs to date, making reliable evaluation increasingly important. Yet even benchmarks that are carefully validated at release can become stale. As models improve, they can discover valid solutions that existing verifiers reject, while changes…

0citations

Multimodal-SEA: Benchmarking AI Agent Security under Multimodal Social Engineering Attacks

2026-11-05 · 2611.08281 · Zhitao He, Chi Him Zhang, Chengru Han et al. · Multimodal

Personal AI agents face social engineering attacks supported by forged multimodal content, but existing evaluations mainly focus on text-based dialogue, leaving their intrinsic security under such attacks insufficiently studied. We introduce Multimodal-SEA, an interactive benchmark comprising 608 expert-designed…

0citations

Terminal-style Mathematical Modeling Bench: The First Agentic and Verifiable Benchmark for Mathematical Modeling

2026-11-05 · 2611.08237 · Xiaojun Wu, Cehao Yang, Xuhui Jiang et al. · Multimodal

Mathematical modeling turns an open-ended real-world problem into assumptions, a model, a solution, and a defended recommendation, and its answers matter only if they are both close to a credible reference and physically feasible; existing benchmarks either score solver fragments or grade reports with an LLM judge…

0citations

RoboARCade: Benchmarking Agentic Robot Control

2026-11-05 · 2611.08209 · Satvik Sharma, Hengyuan Hu, Mihika Kamat et al. · Embodied / robotics

Improvements in multi-modal capabilities have enabled agents to act directly as robot policies, a setting we refer to as agentic robot control (ARC). We introduce RoboARCade, a benchmark of long-horizon manipulation tasks across three embodiments designed to test in-context adaptation, memory, and reasoning for…

0citations

MCPHallu: Benchmarking Reasoning, Execution, and Memory Hallucinations in MCP Agents

2026-11-05 · 2611.07689 · Yizhen Jiang, Haowei Guo, Tianyi Bai et al. · Tool use

Large language model agents are increasingly deployed through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), which allows them to discover and invoke tools across multiple servers at runtime. Existing MCP benchmarks primarily measure task completion; where they diagnose failures, they do so after execution rather than building…

0citations

Beyond Instruction Override: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injection with Task-Tampering Attacks

2026-11-05 · 2611.07640 · Rongting Zhang, Martin Bertran, Sandeep Avula et al. · Tool use

Indirect prompt-injection (IPI) benchmarks predominantly test planted instructions that redirect a tool-using agent toward an attacker-chosen task. Yet attacker-controlled content can instead tamper with the outcome of the task already in progress. A buyer's dispute evidence can cite a false refund policy to inflate…

0citations

τ-bench-LILT: Evaluating Conversational Agents on Realistic Multilingual Tool-Use Tasks

2026-11-04 · 2611.07203 · Kaden Uhlig, Kiarash Mokhtari, Anıl Arslan et al. · Tool use

Frontier evaluations of tool-using conversational agents are conducted almost exclusively in English, leaving a critical gap for organizations deploying agents in other languages and regions. We present $τ$-bench-LILT, a multilingual extension of ${τ^3}$-bench covering German, Korean, Turkish, and Farsi in the…

0citations

VABAR: A Variational Automation Benchmark for Agentic Robotics

2026-11-04 · 2611.06881 · Shuangyu Xie, Kaiyuan Chen, Uksang Yoo et al. · Coding / SWE

For robots to operate reliably in commercial and industrial applications, they must persistently perform specific tasks with known variations in object shape and pose. We call this Variational Automation (VA) to differentiate these settings from fixed automation. Inspired by recent papers on Agentic Robotics, where…

0citations

ServerBench: How can your coding agents design specialized LLM serving systems?

2026-11-04 · 2611.06841 · Xinrui Zhong, Zhiming Wang, Yongqi Liu et al. · Coding / SWE

Large language model (LLM) coding agents develop software through experimentation, offering an opportunity to design the serving systems supporting their own operation. Effective serving requires coordinating implementation and operating decisions under session dependencies, latency constraints, and correctness…

0citations

LifeVal: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Personalized Agentic Consumer Tasks

2026-11-04 · 2611.06687 · Jenny Yang, Elizabeth Proehl, Anjan Bharadwaj et al. · General

We introduce LifeVal, a benchmark evaluating AI model performance on personalized agentic consumer tasks. LifeVal covers the most valuable life tasks that a personalized digital superassistant could automate, representing over 1.7 trillion US dollars in annual willingness-to-pay across 148 consumer task categories…

0citations

PMRecBench: A Benchmark for Personalization in Recommendation Agents under Multimodal Queries

2026-11-04 · 2611.06349 · Xiaoyu Zhang, Yougang Lyu, Bin Wu et al. · Multimodal

On Web platforms for shopping and entertainment, recommendation agents under multimodal queries aim to deliver personalized recommendations that satisfy users' visually specified requirements and reflect preferences inferred from user histories. However, existing personalized recommendation benchmarks use text-only…

0citations

SWEOps-Bench: Evaluating Agents for End-to-End Resolution of Software-Induced Cloud Incidents

2026-11-04 · 2611.06099 · Danwen Chen, Guangba Yu, Pengfei Chen · Coding / SWE

As autonomous agents advance, the traditional boundary between software development and cloud operations gradually blurs, increasing the need for integrated incident detection, localization, and remediation. Existing benchmarks evaluate isolated diagnostic queries or repository-level program repair, failing to test…

0citations

TandemBench: Benchmarking Decision Models for Multi-Agent Collaboration

2026-11-04 · 2611.05827 · Baohang Li, Xiaocheng Feng, Bing Qin · Multi-agent

Decision models choose among predefined options in tasks such as routing and action selection. In multi-agent collaboration, a decision determines how members divide work, exchange resources, and act in parallel. We introduce TandemBench, a benchmark of 1,200 questions in multi-agent cooking scenarios where…

0citations

PersonaCodeBench: Evaluating Coding Agents in Persona-driven Human-Interactive Sessions

2026-11-03 · 2611.05739 · Haixin Wang, Jianheng Hou, Hongyu Shen et al. · Coding / SWE

Coding agents must deliver correct software while respecting users' expertise, preferences, and working conditions. Existing benchmarks increasingly incorporate interaction, yet personalized requirement fulfillment remains underexplored. We introduce PersonaCodeBench, which turns user characteristics into verifiable…

0citations

Construct Validity of Coding Benchmarks for LLM-based Agentic Coding Tools

2026-11-03 · 2611.05665 · Alexander Berndt, Paul Ralph, Thomas Bach et al. · Tool use

Software developers increasingly adopt LLM-based agentic coding tools to assist them with development tasks. To provide developers with up-to-date information on these tools' effectiveness, prior work introduced benchmarks that enable comparisons across tools. Despite the widespread adoption of such benchmarks…

0citations

ViBench 2.0: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Software Building

2026-11-03 · 2611.05620 · Daniel Furman, Preeya Kirani, Ibrahim Sheikh et al. · Web & browser

On Replit, our agentic engineering platform, users now build entire products without writing code, through successive feature requests to an agent. Yet existing coding benchmarks evaluate single, fully specified tasks, and many are near saturation. We introduce ViBench 2.0, a benchmark for long-horizon software…

0citations

SlackBench: Benchmarking Agents on Collaborative Projects Grounded in Real Code Repositories

2026-11-03 · 2611.05512 · Mingxuan Li, Huanzhi Mao, Ruitao Zheng et al. · Work / office

AI Agents are becoming digital coworkers that can browse the web, write code, run experiments, and assist humans over extended horizons. Yet existing benchmarks fall short of real knowledge work: many rely on synthetic data or isolated tasks, missing the complex, multi-party dynamics of collaborative projects, where…

0citations